Bitstamp REST · depth degradation, 30s on 10 SEP 2026
Bitstamp REST · depth — p95 2752ms over the last five minutes, 4.2× the 7-day baseline of 649ms — from Lauterbourg, FR and Carlstadt, US. up24 opened this incident from its own measurements of Bitstamp's public API on 10 SEP 2026 13:10 UTC. It lasted 30s and ended 10 SEP 2026 13:10 UTC, when the component started answering again.
WHAT HAPPENED
- up24 opened the incident at degraded.
- The component started answering again. up24 dates the incident from this moment, not from when its clearing rule finished.
HOW IT FAILED
Over the window, 0 of 1,424 checks failed: timeout ×264.
REST latency for the failing endpoint, per minute, from 10 SEP 2026 12:40 UTC to 10 SEP 2026 13:40 UTC. The gap in the line is where nothing answered.
DID BITSTAMP SAY SO?
Bitstamp publishes a status feed and nothing in it lines up with this incident. That is not proof they stayed silent; it is what their feed says.
up24 opened 189 incidents for Bitstamp in the last 90 days; 7 fall within six hours of something Bitstamp published, and the rest were never mentioned. At the median, Bitstamp's own notice came 1h 34m before up24 opened its incident. Pairing is by time alone — nothing checks that a notice is about the fault up24 measured, so the 2 that up24 timestamped first are not scoops. Every entry links to the venue's own notice so the pairing can be judged.
BITSTAMP — OTHER INCIDENTS
Measured by up24's own probe against Bitstamp's public API, btcusd against USD, every 5s. This page is generated from the incident's own rows — 2 recorded transitions — and nothing on it is reported by Bitstamp.